Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 2054 Download : 795

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Main Article Content

Abstract

Mataram City, West Nusa Tenggara Province, has started a transitional period, including in the world of education. The transition to the new normal requires adjusting the learning process to prepare students to learn normally. This study aims to describe students' physics learning outcomes using a blended learning model. This research is a type of experimental research. The research design was pre-experimental with the type of intact group comparison, where this type of research divided one class into two treatment groups. The population in this study were 11th-grade students of private madrasah majoring in science in Mataram city. The research sample was 50 students who were divided into two groups. The two groups were given a different treatment, where group 1 was taught with a blended learning model, while group 2 was taught using an online learning model. The physics learning outcome data were obtained through the initial and final tests, which were then analyzed descriptively using the N-gain test to determine the achievement of the learning process. Based on the research that has been done, it is found that the group taught with the blended learning model has a mean value of 70.14 with an N-gain of 0.36 (included in the medium category), which indicates that the use of blended models can be used to adjust students during a period of transition to a new normal.  The use of the blended learning model in the learning process is to accustom students to return to normal learning, namely face to face in madrasah. It was done to increase student motivation to learn during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Keywords

New Normal Transition Blended Learning Model Physics Learning Outcomes

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Riyan Rizaldi, D., Doyan, A., Makhrus, M., Fatimah, Z., & Nurhayati, E. (2021). Adaptation to New Normal Conditions: Students Physics Learning Outcomes Using the Blended Learning Model. International Journal of Asian Education, 2(3), 369–376. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v2i3.171
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Alwan, M. (2017). Pengembangan Model Blended Learning Menggunakan Aplikasi Edmodo untuk Mata Pelajaran Geografi SMA. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 4(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v4i1.10505
  2. Fatimah, Z., Hikmawati, H., & Wahyudi, W. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Generatif Dengan Teknik Guided Teaching Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika Kelas XI. Konstan - Jurnal Fisika Dan Pendidikan Fisika, 4(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.20414/konstan.v4i1.25
  3. Fatimah, Z., Rizaldi, D. R., Jufri, A. W., & Jamaluddin, J. (2020). Model Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbantuan Laboratorium Virtual Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Geologi, Dan Geofisika (GeoScienceEd Journal), 1(2), 28–32. https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceedu.v1i2.45
  4. Firdaus, T., Erwin, E., & Rosmiati, R. (2019). Eksperimen Mandiri Siswa dalam Penentuan Percepatan Gravitasi Bumi pada Materi Gerak Jatuh Bebas. Titian Ilmu: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Sciences, 11(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.30599/jti.v11i1.385
  5. Hasmunarti, H., Bahri, A., & Idris, I. S. (2018). Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Blended Learning Terintegrasi Strategi PBLRQA (Problem-Based Learning and Reading, Questioning & Answering) pada Pembelajaran Biologi. Biology Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 101–108. http://103.76.50.195/btl/article/viewFile/8177/4720
  6. Heinze, A. (2008). Blended Learning: An Interpretive Action Reseach Study. University of Salford.
  7. Mandang, T., & Tulandi, D. A. (2020). Peningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Blended Materi Listrik Dinamis. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika UNIMA, 1(1), 28–33. http://eurekaunima.com/index.php/jpfunima/article/view/5/5
  8. Nurhayati, E., Rizaldi, D. R., & Fatimah, Z. (2020). Pencegahan Penyebaran COVID-19 Melalui Inaktivasi Virus dalam Kajian Kinetika, Termodinamika, dan Kesetimbangan. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 5(2), 102–107. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v5i2.121
  9. Nurhayati, E., Rizaldi, D. R., & Fatimah, Z. (2021). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PROJECT-BASED LEARNING WITH THE BLENDED LEARNING SYSTEM TO IMPROVE 21ST CENTURY SKILLS DURING THE COVID-19. Journal Scientia, 9(2), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.35337/scientia.Vol9.pp46-52
  10. Paramita, I. B. G., & Putra, I. G. G. P. A. (2020). NEW NORMAL BAGI PARIWISATA BALI DI MASA PANDEMI COVID 19. Pariwisata Budaya: Jurnal Ilmiah Pariwisata Agama Dan Budaya, 5(2), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.25078/pba.v5i2.1723
  11. Rizaldi, D. R., & Fatimah, Z. (2020). How the Distance Learning can be a Solution during the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Asian Education, 1(3), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v1i3.42
  12. Rizaldi, D. R., Jufri, A. W., & Jamal, J. (2020). PhET: SIMULASI INTERAKTIF DALAM PROSES PEMBELAJARAN FISIKA. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 5(1), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v5i1.103
  13. Rizaldi, D. R., Makhrus, M., & Doyan, A. (2019). Analisis Tingkat Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dengan Model Perubahan Konseptual Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 5(1), 74–81.
  14. Rusman, R., Riyana, C., & Kurniawan, D. (2012). Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi: Mengembangkan Profesionalitas Guru (1st ed.). Rajawali Pers.
  15. Sahidu, K. (2016). Pengembangan Program Pembelajaran Fisika (P3F) (2nd ed.). FKIP Universitas Mataram.
  16. Sari, D. P. (2020). Kreativitas Pendidikan Karakter di Keluarga pada Pandemi Covid-19. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hardiknas, 1, 107–114. http://proceedings.ideaspublishing.co.id/index.php/hardiknas/article/view/16
  17. Syamsu, F. D. (2017). Pengembangan Penuntun Praktikum IPA Berbasis Inkuiri Terbimbing Untuk Siswa SMP Siswa Kelas VII Semester Genap. BIOnatural, 4(2), 13–27. https://ejournal.stkipbbm.ac.id/index.php/bio/article/view/190/177
  18. Trianto, T. (2012). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif :Konsep, landasan, dan Implementasinya pada Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP) (1st ed.). Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  19. Tsaniyah, S. F., Ayu, H. D., & Pratiwi, H. Y. (2019). Pengaruh Model Blended Learning menggunakan Schoology Terhadap Prestasi Belajar ditinjau Dari Kemandirian Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Terapan Sains & Teknologi (RAINSTEK), 1(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.21067/jtst.v1i1.3236
  20. Vo, H. M., Zhu, C., & Diep, N. A. (2017). The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education: A meta-analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.01.002
  21. Wahyuni, S., & Etfita, F. (2018). Pengaruh Blended Learning Model dan Sikap Berbahasa terhadap Kemampuan Menulis Bahasa Inggris Siswa Sekolah Menegah Atas Negeri di Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra (GERAM), 6(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.25299/geram.2018.vol6(2).1910
  22. Wardani, D. N., Toenlioe, A. J. E., & Wedi, A. (2018). Daya Tarik Pembelajaran Di Era 21 Dengan Blended Learning. Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan (JKTP), 1(1), 13–18. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/287323676.pdf
  23. Yanti, D. E. B., Subiki, S., & Yushardi, Y. (2016). Analisis Sarana Prasarana Laboratorium Fisika Dan Intensitas Kegiatan Praktikum Fisika Dalam Mendukung Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Fisika SMA Negeri Di Kabupaten Jember. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 5(1), 41–46. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JPF/article/view/3561/2766}

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.