Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 518 Download : 356

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Main Article Content

Abstract

The phenomena that occur in prisoners are very complex such as loss of life satisfaction, hope, and independence, and they have limitations in social interaction. In addition, other phenomena often occur in prisoners, namely the dropping out of school because they have to undergo a period of detention (Kintamani, 2012). While in the socialization institution, they still get the right to enjoy proper education through equality education. As citizens learning equality education, they can also not be separated from the problems that prisoners often experience. Seeing this phenomenon, the author assumes that learning about citizens is important for subjective well-being and character strength. When citizens learn to have subjective well-being and character strength, they can have life productivity (Holder, 2012). This article is discussed using the literature review method by conceptualizing the grand theory and the results of previous research on subjective well-being and the strength of character combined in the learning process of equality education in social institutions. The purpose of this paper is to support research literature exploration of subjective well-being and exploration of character education

Keywords

Subjective well-being character strength prison equality education

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Mutaqin, M. F. T., & Fajari, L. E. W. (2022). The Importance of Subjective Well-Being and Character Strength for Equality Education at the Prison. International Journal of Asian Education, 3(2), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v3i2.289
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2017). Indeks Kebahagiaan 2017. BPS & CV. Dharmaputra.
  2. Boniwell, I. (2012). Positive Psychology in a Nutshell (The science of happiness) (3 ed.). London: McGraw-Hill Education.
  3. Compton, W. C. (2005). Positive Psychology. USA: Thomson Wadsworth.
  4. Compton, W. C., & Hoffman, E. (2012). Positive psychology: the science of human flourishing (2nd ed). Australia ; Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
  5. Diener, E. (2002). Personality, Culture, and Subjective Well-Being: Emotional and Cognitive Evaluations of Life. Annual Reviews, 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056
  6. Duan, W. (2017). Randomized Trial Investigating of a Single-Session Character-Strength-Based Cognitive Intervention on Freshman’s Adaptability. Research on Social Work Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731517699525
  7. Duan, W., & Bu, H. (2017). Randomized Trial Investigating of a Single-Session Character-Strength-Based Cognitive Intervention on Freshman’s Adaptability. Research on Social Work Practice, 1049731517699525. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731517699525
  8. Graham, C., & Crown, S. (2014). Religion and Well-Being Around the World: Social Purpose, Social Time, or Social Insurance? International Journal of Wellbeing, 4(1). https://internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/index.php/ijow/article/view/258
  9. Hartman E. (2013) Aristotle on Character Formation. In: Luetge C. (eds) Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1494-6_46
  10. Holder, M. D. (2012). Happiness in children: measurement, correlates, and enhancement of positive subjective well-being. Dalam SpringerBriefs in Well-Being and Quality of Life Research. New York: Springer.
  11. Kintamani, I. (2012). Kinerja Pendidikan Kesetaraan sebagai Salah Satu Jenis Pendidikan Nonformal. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 18(1), 65-84–84. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v18i1.70
  12. Leidenfrost, C. M., Calabrese, W., Schoelerman, R. M., Coggins, E., Ranney, M., Sinclair, S. J., & Antonius, D. (2016). Changes in Psychological Health and Subjective Well-Being Among Incarcerated Individuals With Serious Mental Illness. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 22(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078345815618200
  13. Leontopoulou, S., & Triliva, S. (2012). Explorations of subjective well-being and character strengths among a Greek university student sample. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(3). https://internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/index.php/ijow/article/view/99
  14. Licona, T. (2012). Character For Education. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  15. Lopez, S. J. (Ed.). (2009). Encyclopedia of positive psychology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  16. Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Strengths of Character and Well-Being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5), 603–619. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.5.603.50748
  17. Skevington, S. M., & Böhnke, J. R. (2018). How is subjective well-being related to quality of life? Do we need two concepts and both measures? Social Science & Medicine, 206, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.005
  18. Vuk, M. (2017). Inmate Time Utilization and Well-Being. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1927642148/abstract/7507DD94312C4B3CPQ/1
  19. Wooldredge, J. D. (1999). Inmate Experiences and Psychological Well-Being. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854899026002005
  20. Yaumi, M. (2016). Pendidikan karakter: Landasan, Pilar & Implementasi. Prenada Media.

Most read articles by the same author(s)