Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 240 Download : 179

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess the critical thinking skills of adolescence students at junior high schools in Rantepao, particularly in the context of Christian education. This study employed a quantitative design research and using proportionate stratified random sampling method to select the sample. There are 66 students became the sample of this study. Data were collected through questionnaire that assessed the students' critical thinking skills based on the critical thinking indicators. The collected data then analyzed by using descriptive statistics calculation related to the variables of critical thinking skills. Result of this study found that adolescnence students at Junior High School in Rantepao have only a fair level of critical thinking skills in the context of Christian Education. This study highlights the need for improving students' critical thinking skills in the context of Christian Education. Teacher should foster students growth by growth by focusing on their learning process and offering appropriate activities.


 

Keywords

Critical Thinking skills Christian Education Adolescence Students

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Patandung, Y., Panggua, S., & Weol, W. (2023). Adolescence Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in The Context of Christian Education. International Journal of Asian Education, 4(3), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v4i3.349
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Baker, C. (2017). Quantitative research designs: Experimental, quasi-experimental, and descriptive. Evidence-based practice: An integrative approach to research, administration, and practice, 155-183. http://samples.jblearning.com/9781284101539/9781284101539_CH06_Drummond.pdf
  2. Bible, K. J. (1996). King James Bible (Vol. 19). Proquest LLC. http://www.teologiapelainternet.com.br/biblioteca/arquivos/Evangelicos/Biblia/King%20James%20Bible%20Ebook.pdf
  3. Bonnie & Potts. 2003. Strategies for Teaching Critical Thinking : Practical Assesment, Research & Evaluation. [online]. http://edresearch.org/pare/getvn.asp?v=4&n=3.
  4. Dienlin, T., & Johannes, N. (2020). The impact of digital technology use on adolescent well-being. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 22(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/tdienlin
  5. Gantini, P dan Suhendar, D. (2017). Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Bandung: Esensi. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=1064811
  6. Jensen, Eric. (2011). Pembelajaran Berbasis Otak (Edidi Kedua). Jakarta: PT. Indeks Permata Puri Media. https://onesearch.id/Record/IOS2862.UNMAL000000000044802
  7. Johnson, Elaine B. (2014). Contextual Teaching and Learning: Menjadikan Belajar Mengajar Mengasyikkan dan Bermakna. Bandung: Kaifa. https://onesearch.id/Record/IOS2862.UNMAL000000000042388
  8. Panggabean Justice. (2022). Pendidikan Kristiani Berbasis Berpikir Kritis: Sebuah Tawaran Model Pembelajaran Demokratis Berdasarkan Pemikiran Pendidikan Membebaskan Menurut Paulo Freire. Harati: Jurnal Pendidikan Kristen. Vol.2 No. 2. p. 127-145. Kupang: Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Tarutung. https://doi.org/10.54170/harati.v2i2.101
  9. Rosmaini. (2023). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. Vol. 5 No 2. Bandung: University of Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v5i2.4767
  10. Stone, H., Sidel, J. L., & Bloomquist, J. (2008). Quantitative descriptive analysis. Descriptive Sensory Analysis in Practice, 10, 53-69. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470385036#page=72
  11. Suharsimi Arikunto. (2012). Prosedur Penelitian suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=217760
  12. Suhendar, S. (2017). The Experimentation of Project Based Learning Based-Eco-Campus Toward the Students’ Problem Solving Skills and the Emotional Environmental Climate. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 3(1), 32-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v3i1.728
  13. Turan, S., Uzun, S., & Alemdar, U. (2023). Predictors of Internet Addiction in Middle Adolescence. International Journal of Asian Education, 4(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v4i1.322
  14. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Terjemahan bahasa Indonesia: Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). Pikiran dalam Masyarakat: Perkembangan Proses-Proses Psikologis Tingkat Tinggi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.) https://www.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=RxjjUefze_oC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Vygotsky,+L.+S.+(1978).+Mind+in+Society:+The+Development+of+Higher+Psychological+Processes.+Cambridge,+MA:+Harvard+University+Press.+(Terjemahan+bahasa+Indonesia:+Vygotsky,+L.+S.+(1997).+Pikiran+dalam+Masyarakat:+Perkembangan+Proses-Proses+Psikologis+Tingk&ots=ojEWX2p49v&sig=olK5_w897oH2-0iOYdgLi0GB3O8
  15. Walker, A., & Kettler, T. (2020). Developing Critical Thinking Skills in High Ability Adolescents: Effects of a Debate and Argument Analysis Curriculum. Talent, 10(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.46893/talent.758473
  16. Wass, R., & Wass, R. T. (2015). Developing critical thinkers in Higher Education : A Vygotskian perspective A Vygotskian Perspective A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Otago Dunedin , New Zealand. May 2012. https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10523/2491/WassRobertT2012PhD.pdf?sequenc
  17. Yunaini, N., Rukiyati, R., Prabowo, M., Hassan, N. M., & Hermansyah, A. K. (2022). The Concept of the Independent Learning Curriculum (Merdeka Belajar) in Elementary Schools in View Progressivism Educational Philosophy. JIP Jurnal Ilmiah PGMI, 8(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.19109/jip.v8i2.14962