Main Article Content

Abstract

Academic supervision stands out as a commendable initiative designed to aid and bolster teachers in executing their responsibilities within the school setting. Moreover, numerous challenges and hindrances faced by educators are tackled through the implementation of academic supervision activities. This research aims to explore teachers' experiences undergoing academic supervision and the supervisors' support to overcome teacher problems and improve their performance. Researchers used qualitative research methods with an exploratory case study approach. Data was obtained from semi-structured interviews. The informants were four teachers at two integrated Islamic elementary schools in Bekasi, Indonesia, who were selected based on their extensive experience in carrying out school academic supervision. The resulting data was analyzed thematically using Atlas.ti software. The findings reveal that academic supervision is incredibly beneficial for teachers. It does not only assess teacher performance but also helps teachers solve problems to improve teacher performance. Teachers also received many support programs to improve the quality of learning in their schools.

Keywords

Academic Supervision School Supervisor Supervisor Support Program

Article Details

How to Cite
Victorynie, I., & Othman, A. B. (2023). Academic Supervision Practices Integrated into the School Supervisor Support Programs: Teachers’ Point of View. International Journal of Asian Education, 4(4), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v4i4.362

References

  1. Aqib, Z. (2002). Profesionalisme Guru Dalam Pembelajaran. Surabaya: Cendekia.
  2. Arikunto, S. (2006). Dasar-dasar Supervisi. Jakarta: Rineka cipta.
  3. Creswell J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. (3rd Ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  4. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mix Method Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  5. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311
  6. Dharma, Surya. (2008). Metode dan Teknik Supervisi. Jakarta: Ditendik dirjen Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan dan Tendik Depdiknas.
  7. Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri. (2002). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  8. Firmansyah, T. (2019, December 27). Praktisi Pendidikan: Banyak Guru Malas Membaca. Republika. https://m.republika.co.id/berita/pendidikan/eduaction/19/12/27/q36aj0377-praktisi-pendidikan-banyak-guru-malas-membaca
  9. Fritz, C., & Miller, G. (2003). Supervisory Options for Instructional Leaders in Education. Journal of Leadership Education. https://doi.org/10.12806/v2/i2/rf2
  10. Glatthorn, Allan A. (1990). Supervisory Leadership: Introduction to Instructional Supervision. USA: Harper Collins Publisher.
  11. Glickman, Carl D, et al. (2014). Supervision and Instructional Leadership (A development approach). USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
  12. Kaspani. (2019, February 3). Mengapa Kepsek Saya Belum Lakukan Supervisi. Gurusiana. https://kaspani175308.gurusiana.id/article/2019/2/mengapa-kepsek-saya-belum-lakukan supervisi-2650400
  13. Kodir, A. (2021, January 18). Alergi dengan Supervisi. Lembaga Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Kepela Sekolah. http://lppks.kemdikbud.go.id/id/kabar/alergi-dengan-supervisi
  14. Komisi X. (2019, February 16). Indeks Pendidikan Menurun, Komisi X Soroti Kualitas Guru. Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. http://www.dpr.go.id/berita/detail/id/23993 /t/Indeks+Pendidikan+Menurun%2C+Komisi+X+Soroti+Kualitas+Guru
  15. Onyeike, V. C. & Maria, N. C. (2018). Principals' Administrative and Supervisory Roles for Teachers' Job Effectiveness In Secondary Schools In Rivers State. British Journal of Education, 6(6), 38-49. https://www.sfjesgs.com/index.php/SFJESGS/article
  16. Pawlas, George. E & Oliva, Peter. F. (2008). Supervision for Today’s School. USA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  17. Rivai, Veithzal & Murni, Sylviana. (2009). Education Management: Analisis Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  18. Rossman, G., & Rallis, S. F. (2012). Learning in the field: An Introduction to Qualitative Research (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  19. Rugaiyah. (2010). Profesi Kependidikan dalam Perspektif Manajemen Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  20. Subaidi & Sutain. (2019). Supervisi Akademik Kepala Madrasah Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Guru Pada Madrasah Tsanawiyah Nahdlatul Ulama Banat Kudus. Jurnal Islamic Education Management, Vol. 4 No. 2, 147-162. https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/isema/article/view/5602
  21. Wiles, Jon & Bondi, Joseph. (2000). Supervision (A guide to practice). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
  22. Wolf, S., Aber, J., Behrman, J, & Tsinigo, E., 2019. Experimental Impacts of the “Quality Preschool for Ghana” Interventions on Teacher Professional Well-Being, Classroom Quality, and Children’s School Readiness. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 12(1), pp.10-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2018.1517199
  23. Yin, R. K. (2008). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  24. Yunus, S. (2018, November 26). Mengkritisi Kualitas Guru. Media Indonesia. https://mediaindonesia.com/read/detail/200182-mengkritisi-kualitas-guru