Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to establish and understand the conceptual confusion between teaching quality and teacher quality and design a path for their distinction. The study conducted searches on ERIC, ScienceDirect, JSTOR, Sage Journals, Sage Knowledge, Web of Science, and random Google search engine utilization for teaching quality, teacher quality, differences between teacher quality and teaching quality, and conceptual confusion. The study applied Gidden's structuration theory to foster clarity development amid conceptual confusion. The study also highlighted the relevance of the concepts' distinction, inter-relatability, and connecting boundaries and was guided by the research questions: how can the concepts be distinguished from each other? How can the conceptual confusion between them be cleared? The study discovered pathways to understand the conceptual differences through deconstruction, classification, and relationship and role pairing. The study discovered: differences do exist between the two concepts in content and realization; some of the relationships between the concepts serve as their explicit conceptual differentiators: some were discovered to possess purposes of linking the concepts, while some detached the concepts; the existing relationships also unveiled the deriving roles of the concepts on each other and in practice; and proposed a framework for their distinction and clarification. Implications for practice include enablement of professional development needs identification for teachers; clarification of areas for leadership coaching and mentoring of teachers; self-awareness creation for teachers in seeking professional growth; student achievement; school improvement and action research enhancement.

Keywords

conceptual confusion conceptual analysis conceptual clarity teaching quality teacher quality

Article Details

Author Biography

Luo Shengquan, Southwest University, China

Luo Shengquan is a professor and a Dean at the Faculty of Education, Southwest University, China. He is also a Deputy Director at the Department of Curriculum and Teaching, in the same faculty. His research fields are Principles of Education and Principles of Curriculum and Teaching. He is also a director of the National Curriculum Academic Committee and a Director of the Chongqing Curriculum and Teaching Theory Professional Committee.

How to Cite
Aidoo, A., & Shengquan, L. (2021). (Literature Review) The Conceptual Confusion of Teaching Quality and Teacher Quality, and a Clarity Pursuit. International Journal of Asian Education, 2(2), 98-119. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v2i2.168

References

  1. Arnold, I. (2011). John Hattie: Visible learning- A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. International Review of Education, 57, 219–221. doi:10.1007/s11159-011-9198-8
  2. Baier, F., Decker, A.T., Voss, T., Kleickmann, T., Klusmann, U., & Kunter, M. (2018). What makes a good teacher? The relative importance of mathematics teachers' cognitive ability, personality, knowledge, beliefs, and motivation for instructional quality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 767-786. doi:10.1111/bjep.12256
  3. Bell, C. A., Gitomer, D. H., McCaffrey, D. F., Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., & Qi, Y. (2012). An argument approach to observation protocol validity. Educational Assessment, 17, 62–87. doi:10.1080/10627197.2012.715014
  4. Brophy, J. (1999). Toward a model of the value aspects of motivation in education: Developing appreciation. Educational Psychologist, 34, 75-85. doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3402_1
  5. Cheng, M. (2017). Reclaiming quality in higher education: A human factor approach. Quality in Higher Education, 23, 153–167. doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2017.1358954
  6. Churchward, P., & Willis, J. (2018). The pursuit of teacher quality: Identifying some of the multiple discourses of quality that impact the work of teacher educators. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 1-14. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2018.1555792
  7. Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, K. (2005). The AERA panel on research and teacher education: Context and goals. In M. Cochran-Smith, & K. M. Zeichner, (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 37–68). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  8. Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships in the classroom. Review of Educational Research, 77, 113–143. doi:10.3102/003465430298563
  9. Darling-Hammond, L., Burns, D., Campbell, C., Goodwin, A. L., Hammerness, K., Low, E. L., … & Zeichner, K. (2017). Empowered Educators: How high-performing systems shape teaching quality around the world. John Wiley & Sons.
  10. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis, 8(1), 1-44. doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000
  11. Fenstermacher, G. D., & Richardson, V. (2005). On making determinations of quality in teaching. Teachers College Record, 107, 186-213. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00462.x
  12. Fischer, J., Praetorius, A. K., & Klieme, E. (2019). The impact of linguistic similarity on cross-cultural comparability of students' perceptions of teaching quality. Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability, 31, 201-220. doi:10.1007/s11092-019-09295-7
  13. Fitchett, P. G., & Heafner, T. L. (2018). Teacher quality or quality teaching? Eighth-grade social studies teachers' professional characteristics and classroom instruction as predictors of U.S. history achievement. Research in Middle-Level Education, 41(9), 1-17. doi:10.1080/19404476.2018.1514826
  14. Freidson, E. (1994). Professionalism Reborn; theory, prophecy, and policy. Blackwell Publishers.
  15. Giddens, A. (2005). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Routledge.
  16. Gitomer, D. H. (2018). Evaluating instructional quality. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30, 68-78. doi:10.1080/09243453.2018.1539016
  17. Gitomer, D. H., & Zisk, R. C. (2015). Knowing what teachers know. Review of Research in Education, 39(1), 1-53. doi:10.3102/0091732X14557001
  18. Grosse, C., Kluczniok, K., & Rossbach, H. G. (2017). Instructional quality in school entrance phase and its influence on students' vocabulary development: Empirical findings from the German longitudinal study BiKS. Early Child Development and Care, 189(9), 1–14. doi:10.1080/03004430.2017.1398150
  19. Hafen, C. A., Hamre, B. K., Allen, J. P., Bell, C. A., Gitomer, D. H., & Pianta, R. C. (2014). Teaching through interactions in secondary school classrooms: Revisiting the factor structure and practical application of the classroom assessment scoring system–secondary. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35, 651–680. doi:10.1177/0272431614537117
  20. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon, Routledge.
  21. Hénard, F., & Roseveare, D. (2012). Fostering quality teaching in higher education: Policies and practices. Paris: OECD.
  22. Henard, F. (2010). Learning our lesson review of quality teaching in higher education. Paris: OECD. doi.org/10.1787/9789264079281
  23. Hiebert, J., & Stigler, J. W. (2017). Teaching versus teachers as a lever for change: Comparing a Japanese and a U.S. perspective on improving instruction. Educational Researcher, 46(4), 169–176. doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17711899
  24. Hill, H., Umland, K., Litke, E., & Kapitula, L. R. (2012). Teacher quality and quality teaching: Examining the relationship of a teacher assessment to practice. American Journal of Education, 118(489-519)
  25. Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Addison-Wesley Publication.
  26. Holtsch, D., Hartig, J., & Shavelson, R. (2018). Do practical and academic preparation paths lead to differential commercial teacher quality? Vocations and Learning, 12, 23-46. doi:10.1007/s12186-018-9208-0
  27. Kaplan, L. S., & Owings, W. A. (2001). Teacher quality and student achievement: Recommendations for principals. NASSP Bulletin, 85, 64-73.
  28. Kennedy, M. M. (2010). Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality. Educational Researcher, 39(8), 591–598. doi:10.3102/0013189X10390804
  29. Klieme, E., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2009). The Pythagoras study-investigating effects of teaching and learning in Swiss and German mathematics classrooms. In T. Janik, & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp. 137–160). Waxmann.
  30. Klieme, E., Schümer, G., & Knoll, S. (2001). Mathematikunterricht der sekundarstufe: Aufgabenkultur und unterrichtsgestaltung im internationalen vergleich [mathematics instructionnat lower secondary level: task culture and quality of instruction]. In J. Baumert, & E. Klieme (Eds.), TIMSS - Impulse für schule und unterricht: Forschungsbefunde, reforminitiativen, praxisberichte und video-dokumente (pp. 43–57). Bonn: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  31. Madu, C. N., & Kuei, C. (1993). Dimension of quality teaching in higher institutions, total quality management. International Journal of Management in Education, 4, 325-338. doi.org/10.1080/09544129300000046
  32. Mincu, M. (2015). Teacher quality and school improvement: what is the role of research? Oxford Review of Education. 41. 10.1080/03054985.2015.1023013.
  33. Mitchell, K. J., Robinson, D. Z., Plake, B. S., Knowles, K. T. (2001). Testing Teacher Candidates: The Role of Licensure Tests in Improving Teacher Quality. National Academy Press. doi.org/10.17226/10090.
  34. Monsegue-Bailey, P. (2018). Instructional quality and middle school student engagement, achievement, attendance, and gender [doctoral dissertation Walden University]. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. https://scholarworks.walden.edu/dissertations/5906
  35. Murphy, C. A., & Jensen, T. D. (2016). Faculty teaching development: Using the multidimensional matrix of teaching development to guide teaching improvement activities. Journal of Effective Teaching, 16, 61-75. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1117782.pdf
  36. Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 3–53. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1019
  37. Myburgh, S., & Tammaro, A. M. (2013). Constructing a theoretical framework. In S. Myburgh, & A.M. Tammaro, Exploring education for digital librarians (pp.133–172). Chandos Publishing. doi:10.1016/b978-1-84334-659-3.50007-4
  38. Nilsen, T., & Gustafsson, J. (2016). Teacher Quality, Instructional Quality, and Student Outcomes. Springer International Publishing.
  39. Pelletier, F. J. (1994). The principle of semantic compositionality. Topoi, 13(1), 11–24. doi:10.1007/bf00763644
  40. Perez, B. (2013). Teacher quality and teaching quality of 7th-grade algebra I honor teachers [doctoral dissertation, Florida Atlantic University]. DataStream. https://fau.digital.flvc.org/islandora/object/fau%3A4133/datastream/OBJ/download/Teacher_quality_and_teaching_quality_of_7th-grade_Algebra_1_Honors_teachers.pdf
  41. Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365–386). Springer. doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17
  42. Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38, 109–119. doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09332374
  43. Rice, J. K. (2003). Teacher Quality: Understanding the Effectiveness of Teacher Attributes. Economic Policy Institute.
  44. Rieser, S., Naumann, A., Decristan, J., Fauth, B., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2016). The connection between teaching and learning: Linking teaching quality and metacognitive strategy use in primary school. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 526–545. doi:10.1111/bjep.12121
  45. Rimm-Kaufman, S., & Hamre, B. (2010). The role of psychological and developmental science in efforts to improve teacher quality. Teachers College Record, 112(12), 2988–3023. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281379023_The_Role_of_Psychological_and_Developmental_Science_in_Efforts_to_Improve_Teacher_Quality
  46. Rjosk, C., Richter, D., Hochweber, J., Lüdtke, O., Klieme, E., & Stanat, P. (2014). Socioeconomic and language minority classroom composition and individual reading achievement: The mediating role of instructional quality. Learning and Instruction, 32, 63–72. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.007
  47. Roehrig, G. H., Michlin, M., Schmitt, L., MacNabb, C., & Dubinsky, J. M. (2012). Teaching neuroscience to science teachers: Facilitating the translation of inquiry-based teaching instruction to the classroom. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11, 413-424. doi:10.1187/cbe.12-04-0045
  48. Ruiz-Alfonso, Z., & León, J. (2019). Teaching quality: Relationships between passion, deep strategy to learn, and epistemic curiosity. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30, 212-230. doi:10.1080/09243453.2018.1562944
  49. Sachs, J. (2016). Accountability, standards, and activism: A challenge or opportunity for teacher education. In J. C. Lee, & C. Day (Eds.), Quality and change in teacher education: Western and Chinese perspectives (pp. 251–262). Springer.
  50. Sartori, G. (2009). Guidelines for concept analysis. In D. Collier, & J. Gerring (Eds.), Concepts and method in social science: The tradition of Giovanni Sartori (pp. 97–150). Routledge.
  51. Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77, 454– 499. doi.org/10.3102/003465430731031
  52. Stern, B. B. (2006) What Does Brand Mean? Historical-Analysis method and construct definition. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 216–23. doi.org/10.1177/0092070305284991
  53. Tahtinen, J., & Havila, V. (2019). Conceptually confused, but on a field level? A method for conceptual analysis and its application. Marketing Theory, 19, 533–557. doi:10.1177/1470593118796677
  54. Teacher Task Force. (n.d.). Teacher policies and practices to address education for all (EFA). http://www.teachersforefa.unesco.org/v2/phocadownload/consoldidatedcasestudies_anglophone.pdf
  55. Thellefsen, T. (2004). Knowledge profiling: The basis for knowledge organization. Library Trends, 52, 507-514.
  56. Wang, J., Lin, E., Spalding, E., Klecka, C. L., & Odell, S. J. (2011). Quality teaching and teacher education: A kaleidoscope of notions. Journal of Teacher Education, 62, table331-338. doi.org/10.1177/0022487111409551
  57. Zablotsky, B., & Rosenberg, M. S. (2013). Special education and academic achievement. In J. Hattie, & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 170–172). Routledge.