Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1680 Download : 695

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Main Article Content

Abstract

Ethnography offers a holistic approach to qualitative researchers in educational contexts and appeals to scholars who wish seek to reveal rich narratives through their immersion in specific domains. This review paper examines the mobilization of the ethnographic research approach reported in studies from two distinctive learning contexts: an elementary school and a vocational college. Employing the specific evaluative criteria of Punch (2005), the desk-based study draws on existing literature to document the strengths and limitations of ethnographic method and reportage to reveal edifying insights to novice and experienced qualitative researchers who may be contemplating an ethnographic study in the future. The review reveals how extensive ethnography lends itself well to presenting thick descriptions in rich narratives to demonstrate high veracity. In contrast, this research approach may be limited in its verisimilitude, especially if ethnographers abridge their methodological and analytical descriptions and fail to acknowledge reactivity

Keywords

Ethnography Evaluation Qualitative research Education Research methods

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Howard, N.-J. (2021). Examining the Strengths and Limitations of Ethnographic Research: An Evaluation of Two Studies in Distinctive Educational Contexts. International Journal of Asian Education, 2(4), 549–558. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v2i4.238
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Aunger, R. (1994). Sources of variation in ethnographic interview data: Food avoidances in the Ituri Forest, Zaire. Ethnology, 33(1), 65–99. https://doi.org/10.2307/3773975
  2. Boud, D., & Middleton, H. (2003). Learning from others at work: Communities of practice and informal learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(5), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620310483895
  3. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/the-foundations-of-social-research/book207972
  4. Cunningham, G. (1998). Assessment in the classroom. London. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=fKh6keJ2eOYC
  5. Denscombe, M. (2014). The good research guide for small-scale social research projects. McGraw-Hill Education. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=SMovEAAAQBAJ
  6. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
  7. Jones, J., & Smith, J. (2017). Ethnography: challenges and opportunities. Evidence-Based Nursing, 20, 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2017-102786
  8. Journal of Work Place Learning. (2016). Author Guidelines. http://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/author_guidelines.htm?id=jwl#10
  9. Kisielnicki, J. (2008). Virtual Technologies: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. Information Science Reference, Hershey. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=aau9AQAAQBAJ
  10. LeCompte, M., & Goetz, J. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52(1), 31–60. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543052001031
  11. Locke, L., Silverman, S. J., & Spirduso, W. W. (1998). Reading and understanding research. Sage Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/reading-and-understanding-research/book233099
  12. Mills, D., & Morton, M. (2013). Ethnography in education. SAGE. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=kaeHAwAAQBAJ
  13. Neuman, W. (2006). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (6th ed.). Allyn and Bacon. https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/product/Neuman-Social-Research-Methods-Qualitative-and-Quantitative-Approaches-6th-Edition/9780205457939.html
  14. Perri, 6., & Bellamy, C. (2012). Principles of methodology research design in social science. Sage. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/principles-of-methodology/book235497
  15. Piaget. J. (1929). The child's conception of the world. Paul Trench and Trubner.
  16. Ponterotto, J. G. (2006). Brief note on the origins, evolution, and meaning of the qualitative research concept "thick description." The Qualitative Report, 11(3), 538–549. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2006.1666
  17. Punch, K. (2005). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (2nd ed.). Sage.
  18. Reeves, S., Kuper, A., & Hodges, B. (2008). Qualitative research methodologies: Ethnography. BMJ, 337.
  19. ResearchGate. (2021). Journal of Workplace Learning. https://www.researchgate.net/journal/13665626_Journal_of_Workplace_Learing
  20. Richardson, L. (2000). Evaluating ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), 253–255.
  21. Robson, Colin. (2002). Real-world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Blackwell.
  22. Scott, D., & Morrison, M. (2007). Key ideas in educational research. Continuum.
  23. Stewart, A. (1998). Qualitative research methods: The ethnographer's method. SAGE. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/the-ethnographers-method/book7527
  24. Thomson, P., Hall, C., & Russell, L. (2007). If these walls could speak: Reading displays of primary children's work. Ethnography and Education, 2(3), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457820701547450
  25. Wellington, J. (2000). Educational research: Contemporary issues and practical approaches. Continuum.
  26. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity (Learning in doing). Cambridge University Press. http://www.linqed.net/media/15868/COPCommunities_of_practiceDefinedEWenger.pdf
  27. White, P. (2009). Developing research questions: A guide for social scientists. Palgrave Macmillan. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=z-AqDwAAQBAJ