Main Article Content


Learning causes relatively a permanent change in one's behavior. There are multiple paradigms in the theories of learning, the latest theory in this group being Constructivism. This particular theory postulates that a learner himself/herself constructs his/her learning through an active and consistent engagement. This theory also brings the learning process to the center, where the concerned learner's prior experience is used as the base for future learning. Although quality learning is the global agenda in the 21st century, there is still no clear and concise definition. Quality of learning has diverse connotations. Researchers in this area search for it in its process as well as in its product. However, one may say the quality learning process motivates a student to have a deep engagement with the learning task possible through some suitable strategies. Kevin Warburton (2009) identified three main factors that greatly impact a student's motivation, leading to high or low engagement in the learning activity. A conducive learning environment, sophisticated course content, and favorable individual factors could enhance the student's motivation and make him/her have a deep engagement in the learning activity. The product of quality learning is measured by the nature and versatility of the learning outcome. The learning, which is extensive, integrative, and generative, may fulfill the rising demand for quality of learning.


Learning Quality learning Learning approach

Article Details

How to Cite
Asad Ali, M., & Masih, A. (2021). (Literature Review) Enhancing the Quality of Learning through Changes in Students’ Approach to Learning. International Journal of Asian Education, 2(3), 455–461.


  1. Aistear, (2012). “Learnig dispositions” Department of Education, New South Wales. Retrieve from:
  2. Arda et al., (2010). "Effect of physical school environment on student educational performance in Nablus city schools" Project report, Faculty of Nursing, An-Najah University. Retrieve from:
  3. Biggs, J. B. (1987). Students approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from:
  4. Biggs, J. B. (2001). The reflective institution: Assuring and Enhancing the Quality of Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from:
  5. Bruner, J.S. (1960). The Process of Education, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Retrieve from:
  6. Simon, B. S. & Ruth, D. C. (2012). "Learning dispositions and transferable competencies: pedagogy, modeling and learning analytics." In: 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, 29 Apr - 02 May 2012, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.Retrieve from:
  7. Carroll, J.B. (1963).A model of school learning, Teachers College Record, Vol. 64, pp. 723-33.Retrieve from:
  8. Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainty. New York: Minton. Retrieved from:
  9. Hounsell, D. (1997). Understanding teaching and teaching for understanding, in Marton, F., Hounsell, D., and Entwistle, N. (Eds), The Experience of Learning, Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh, pp. 238-57.Retrieve from:
  10. Piaget, J. (1980). The psychogenesis of knowledge and its epistemological significance. In M.Piatelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning (pp. 23-34). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from:
  11. Kirby, J. R. & Lawson, M. J. (2012).Enhancing the quality of learning: dispositions, instruction, and learning, Cambridge University Press. Retrieve from:
  12. Marton, F. &Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I outcome and process. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46,4-11.Retrieve from:
  13. Mayer, R.E. (2002). "Rote versus Meaningful Learning." Theory into Practice, 41, 226-232.Retrieve from:
  14. NCERT. (2005). National Curriculum Framework 2005. New Delhi: NCERT.Retrieve from:
  15. Ramsden, P. (1997). The context of learning in academic departments, in Marton, F., Hounsell, D., and Entwistle, N. (Eds), The Experience of Learning, Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh, pp. 198-216.
  16. Rogers, C.R. (1969), Freedom to Learn, Merrill, Columbus, OH.
  17. Retrieved from:
  18. Svensson, L. (1976). Study Skill and Learning, Gothenburg.Retrieve from:
  19. Svensson, L. (1977). On qualitative differences in learning: III-Study skill and learning, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, pp. 233-24.Retrieve from:
  20. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  21. Retrieved from:
  22. Warburton, K. (2003), "Deep learning and education for sustainability," International Journal of
  23. Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 4 Iss: 1 pp. 44 – 56.Retrieve from:
  24. Woodworth, R.S. (1945). Psychology.London: Methuen.
  25. UNESCO,(2012) A Place To Learn: Lessons From Research On Learning Environments: Accessed 30/09/2019 Retrieve from: