Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper has been retracted.


The study aims to examine the process of adaptive theory in leadership as a guide to educational management mechanisms in terms of qualities and characteristics of leadership, challenges of leadership, strengthening accountability in leadership, the problem-solving process in leadership, and the decision-making process in leadership. The study employs a quantitative research design. It adopts the immersive pedagogical method in education and leadership mechanisms that constitutes challenges in the educational leadership theory and mechanism. The study employs a convenient sampling technique. The study comprised thirty-two (32) respondents only. Results show that qualities and characteristics of leadership foresee the change and understanding of the process in the educational system, understand the persistence and process of the pressure gradually. Willingness to handle the situation and leadership challenges focus on effective teachers and effective leaders, the principles and competency in learning, innovate change for leaders to enact new resources in the educational system in creative challenges for new development realities and solutions to work. Strengthening accountability in leadership, ensuring precautionary measures in a better relationship in school organization and educational system and innovating change and behavior in the educational system, and diagnosing the symptoms of the situation to include the techniques in solving the expected and decision-making process in leadership style in the educational system. Finally, it explores the adaptive theory application in leadership as a guide in the educational management system and mechanisms to provide suggestions and follow-up for further study and development.

Keywords

adaptive theory approach in leadership qualities and characteristics of leadership challenges of leadership the problem-solving process in leadership

Article Details

How to Cite
Mallillin, L. L. D. (2022). RETRACTED ARTICLE: Adaptive Theory Approach In Leadership: A Guide to Educational Management System and Mechanisms. International Journal of Asian Education, 3(4), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v3i4.282

References

  1. Admiraal, W., Schenke, W., De Jong, L., Emmelot, Y., & Sligte, H. (2021). Schools as professional learning communities: what can schools do to support professional development of their teachers? Professional development in education, 47(4), 684-698. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1665573
  2. Berkovich, I., & Bogler, R. (2021). Conceptualising the mediating paths linking effective school leadership to teachers’ organisational commitment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 410-429. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1741143220907321
  3. Bianchi, C., Nasi, G., & Rivenbark, W. C. (2021). Implementing collaborative governance: models, experiences, and challenges. Public Management Review, 23(11), 1581-1589. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1878777
  4. Bryman, A. (2007). Effective leadership in higher education: A literature review. Studies in higher education, 32(6), 693-710. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701685114
  5. Cheng, E. C. (2021). Knowledge management for improving school strategic planning. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(5), 824-840. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220918255
  6. Cho, V., Borowiec, K., & Tuthill, K. F. (2021). Organizational problem-solving and school discipline: comparing the roles of schoolwide behavior management technologies. Journal of Educational Administration. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JEA-10-2020-0229/full/html
  7. Collins, C. J. (2021). Expanding the resource based view model of strategic human resource management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(2), 331-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1711442
  8. Corazza, G. E., Reiter-Palmon, R., Beghetto, R. A., & Lubart, T. (2021). Intelligence and creativity in the space-time continuum for education, business, and development. Journal of Creativity, 31, 100003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2021.100003
  9. Da’as, R. A., & Zibenberg, A. (2021). Conflict, control and culture: Implications for implicit followership and leadership theories. Educational Review, 73(2), 194-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1601614
  10. Gian, P., & Bao, D. (2021). The Competences of Teaching Staff and Principals in the Context of Educational Innovation and School Development. International Education Studies, 14(1), 65-75. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1281379
  11. Ganon-Shilon, S., Schechter, C., & Qadach, M. (2021). Implicit leadership theory: principals' sense-making and cognitive complexity. International Journal of Educational Management. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJEM-02-2020-0086/full/html
  12. Hamilton, D., McKechnie, J., Edgerton, E., & Wilson, C. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: a systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(1), 1-32. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40692-020-00169-2
  13. Lassoued, K., Awad, A., & Guirat, R. (2020). The impact of managerial empowerment on problem solving and decision making skills: The case of Abu Dhabi University. Management Science Letters, 10(4), 769-780. http://dx.doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.10.020
  14. Lozano, R., Lukman, R., Lozano, F. J., Huisingh, D., & Lambrechts, W. (2013). Declarations for sustainability in higher education: becoming better leaders, through addressing the university system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.006
  15. Mallillin, L. L. D., & Mallillin, J. B. (2019). Competency skills and performance level of faculties in the higher education institution (HEI). European Journal of Education Studies. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3566454
  16. Marasan, R. B. (2021). A Principal’s Leadership Excellence Though Disposition of Attributes. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(11), 5360-5371. https://www.turcomat.org/index.php/turkbilmat/article/view/6762
  17. Mazurkiewicz, G. (2021). Educational Leadership in Times of Crisis. Risks, 9(5), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9050090
  18. Park, H. (2021). Reliability using Cronbach alpha in sample survey. The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, 34(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2021.34.1.001
  19. Patel, S., & Lasley, J. (2021). Is Leadership Antidisciplinary? A Krebs Cycle of Creativity Approach With Game-Based Applications. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 18(2), 165-171. https://search.proquest.com/openview/c33ef7003f303e134b4a783b4f307775/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=39006
  20. Radinger, T. (2014). School Leader Appraisal—A Tool to Strengthen School Leaders' Pedagogical Leadership and Skills for Teacher Management?. European Journal of Education, 49(3), 378-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12085
  21. Raei, M., & LeMaster, C. (2021). Adaptive and Complexity Leadership: Stronger Together. In Adaptive Leadership in a Global Economy (pp. 11-28). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003099109-1/adaptive-complexity-leadership-stronger-together-mohammed-raei-cheryl-lemaster
  22. Robinson, V., Meyer, F., Le Fevre, D., & Sinnema, C. (2021). The quality of leaders’ problem-solving conversations: Truth-seeking or truth-claiming?. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 20(4), 650-671. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2020.1734627
  23. Shaturaev, J., & Bekimbetova, G. (2021). THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND THE IMPORTANCE OF EDUCATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY. InterConf. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jakhongir-Shaturaev/publication/357271334_SCIENTIFIC_HORIZON_IN_THE_CONTEXT_OF_SOCIAL_CRISES_68_THE_DIFFERENCE_BETWEEN_EDUCATIONAL_MANAGEMENT_AND_EDUCATIONAL_LEADERSHIP_AND_THE_IMPORTANCE_OF_EDUCATIONAL_RESPONSIBILITY/links/61c46747abcb1b520adb0440/SCIENTIFIC-HORIZON-IN-THE-CONTEXT-OF-SOCIAL-CRISES-68-THE-DIFFERENCE-BETWEEN-EDUCATIONAL-MANAGEMENT-AND-EDUCATIONAL-LEADERSHIP-AND-THE-IMPORTANCE-OF-EDUCATIONAL-RESPONSIBILITY.pdf
  24. Sinnema, C., Meyer, F., Le Fevre, D., Chalmers, H., & Robinson, V. (2021). Educational leaders’ problem-solving for educational improvement: Belief validity testing in conversations. Journal of Educational Change, 1-49. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10833-021-09437-z
  25. Stratton, S. J. (2021). Population research: convenience sampling strategies. Prehospital and disaster Medicine, 36(4), 373-374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X21000649
  26. Sulich, A., Sołoducho-Pelc, L., & Ferasso, M. (2021). Management styles and decision-making: Pro-ecological strategy approach. Sustainability, 13(4), 1604. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041604
  27. Tortorella, G., Miorando, R., Caiado, R., Nascimento, D., & Portioli Staudacher, A. (2021). The mediating effect of employees’ involvement on the relationship between Industry 4.0 and operational performance improvement. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 32(1-2), 119-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1532789
  28. Torlak, N. G., Demir, A., & Budur, T. (2021). Decision-making, leadership and performance links in private education institutes. Rajagiri Management Journal. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/RAMJ-10-2020-0061/full/html
  29. Ueland, J. S., Hinds, T. L., & Floyd, N. D. (2021). Equity at the edge of chaos: Applying complex adaptive systems theory to higher education. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2021(189-192), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.20356
  30. Woods, P. A., Roberts, A., Jarvis, J., & Culshaw, S. (2021). Autonomy, leadership and leadership development in England’s school system. School Leadership & Management, 41(1-2), 73-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1811661
  31. Zhang, Z., Gao, Y., & Li, Z. (2020). Consensus reaching for social network group decision making by considering leadership and bounded confidence. Knowledge-Based Systems, 204, 106240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106240