Main Article Content

Abstract

International graduate students reluctantly partook in the distance learning with the closure of national borders with the outbreak of COVID-19. Different instructional modes (in-person, online, and hybrid) and timing of the online learning exposure would play a role in international students’ academic achievement considering the expectations and motivations to learn abroad. Based on 267 course-based panel data, for the same courses, online-mode teaching yielded worse Grade Point Averages (GPAs) and less of a sense of class community compared to the in-person mode. Similarly, students who started the program after COVID-19 (i.e., Class of 2022) performed worse than those who changed their mode of study during their study due to COVID-19 (i.e., Class of 2021). The more frequent interactions with schoolmates and professors partially mediated this detrimental effect of international online learning. Online learning, on average, decreases the GPA by 0.2 standard deviations (p<0.05). However, this effect became insignificant in the model with the frequency of interacting with classmates or professors that raise the GPA by 0.686 and 0.216 standard deviations (p,0.05), respectively. As the study sheds light on the predicament of emergent distance learning, the study addresses some cautious notes on designing effective and sustainable international education in the post-pandemic era.

Keywords

COVID-19 pandemic distance learning emergent online learning international students graduate school academic performance

Article Details

How to Cite
Jung, J., & Wong, C. Y. (2023). Emergent Online Teaching Effect on International Graduate Students’ Academic Performance in Japan during COVID-19. International Journal of Asian Education, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v4i1.314

References

  1. ABC News. (2021, October 18). When is international travel to and from Australia allowed? Can non-residents enter the country?. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-10-18/international-travel-overseas-australia-border-when-rules/100546986?utm_campaign=abc_news_web&utm_content=link&utm_medium=content_shared&utm_source=abc_news_web
  2. Aguilera-Hermida, A. P. (2020). College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100011. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266637402030011X
  3. Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID-19. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(3), 285-292. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1264743.pdf
  4. Bacon, D. R., & Bean, B. (2006). GPA in research studies: An invaluable but neglected opportunity. Journal of Marketing Education, 28(1), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475305284638
  5. Boardman, K. L., Vargas, S. A., Cotler, J. L., & Burshteyn, D. (2021). Effects of emergency online learning during COVID-19 pandemic on student performance and connectedness. Information Systems Education Journal, 19(4), 23–36. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1310048.pdf
  6. Callister, R. R., & Love, M. S. (2016). A comparison of learning outcomes in skills‐based courses: Online versus face‐to‐face formats. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(2), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12093
  7. Chen, C. C., & Jones, K. T. (2007). Blended learning vs. traditional classroom settings: Assessing effectiveness and student perceptions in an MBA accounting course. Journal of Educators Online, 4(1), 1–15. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ907743.pdf
  8. Conole, G., De Laat, M., Dillon, T., & Darby, J. (2008). ‘Disruptive technologies,’ ‘pedagogical innovation’: What’s new? Findings from an in-depth study of students’ use and perception of technology. Computers & Education, 50(2), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.009
  9. Coryn, C. L., Becho, L. W., Westine, C. D., Mateu, P. F., Abu-Obaid, R. N., Hobson, K. A., ... & Ramlow, M. (2020). Material incentives and other potential factors associated with response rates to Internet surveys of American Evaluation Association members: Findings from a randomized experiment. American Journal of Evaluation, 41(2), 277-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214018818371
  10. Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., & Glowatz, M. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries' higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Teaching and Learning, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7
  11. Drelich-Zbroja, A., Jamroz-Wiśniewska, A., Kuczyńska, M., Zbroja, M., Cyranka, W., Drelich, K., ... & Markiewicz, K. (2021). The impact of study mode (online vs. hybrid) on early symptoms of depression and coping strategies among university students in Poland in time of COVID-19 pandemic—Preliminary study. Brain Sciences, 11(12), 1578. https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/brainsci11121578
  12. Dupeyrat, C., & Mariné, C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.007
  13. Epp, C. D., Phirangee, K., Hewitt, J., & Perfetti, C. A. (2020). Learning management system and course influences on student actions and learning experiences. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3263–3297. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11423-020-09821-1
  14. Hastings, C., Ramia, G., Wilson, S., Mitchell, E., & Morris, A. (2021). Precarity Before and During the Pandemic: International Student Employment and Personal Finances in Australia. Journal of Studies in International Education. Online First. https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153211065136
  15. Hari, A., Nardon, L., & Zhang, H. (2021). A transnational lens into international student experiences of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Global Networks. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12332
  16. Hipp, L., Bünning, M., Munnes, S., & Sauermann, A. (2020). Problems and pitfalls of retrospective survey questions in COVID-19 studies. In Survey Research Methods (Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 109–1145). Konstanz, Germany: European Survey Research Association. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2020.v14i2.7741
  17. Holmes, C. M., & Reid, C. (2017). A comparison study of on-campus and online learning outcomes for a research methods course. The Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 9(2), 1–24. https://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/jcps/vol9/iss2/15/
  18. Johnson, N., Veletsianos, G., & Seaman, J. (2020). U.S. faculty and administrators’ experiences and approaches in the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic. Online Learning, 24(2), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2285
  19. Jones, S. (2006). Evaluation of instructor knowledge on structuring and facilitating effective online discourse. The Journal of Educators Online, 3(2), 1–14. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=348190e0108ee2818490719db2063459b8fdefb7
  20. Karadag, E. (2021). Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on grade inflation in higher education in Turkey. PLoS One, 16(8), e0256688, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256688.
  21. Krosnick, J. A. (1991). Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 213–236 https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305
  22. Ku, H.-Y., Tseng, H. W., & Akarasriworn, C. (2013). Collaboration factors, teamwork satisfaction, and student attitudes toward online collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 922–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.019
  23. Ladyshewsky, R. (2013). Instructor presence in online courses and student satisfaction. The International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 1–23. https://espace.curtin.edu.au/bitstream/handle/20.500.11937/38589/196651_100519_Instructor_Presence_Ladyshewsky.pdf?sequence=2
  24. Lapsley, R., Kulik, B., Moody, R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Is identical really identical? An investigation of equivalency theory and online learning. Journal of Educators Online, 5(1), 1–19. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ904041.pdf
  25. Li, J., Wong, S. C., Yang, X., & Bell, A. (2020). Using feedback to promote student participation in online learning programs: Evidence from a quasi-experimental study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 485–510. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11423-019-09709-9
  26. Lyke, J., & Frank, M. (2012). Comparison of student learning outcomes in online and traditional classroom environments in a psychology course. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 39(4), 245–250. https://search.proquest.com/openview/6fe020f26d1d048af8e32f7f4036c296/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=48173
  27. Maatuk, A. M., Elberkawi, E. K., Aljawarneh, S., Rashaideh, H., & Alharbi, H. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic and e-learning: Challenges and opportunities from the perspective of students and instructors. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09274-2
  28. Di Malta, G., Bond, J., Conroy, D., Smith, K., & Moller, N. (2022). Distance education students’ mental health, connectedness and academic performance during COVID-19: A mixed-methods study. Distance Education, 43(1), 97-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2022.2029352
  29. Martin, H. (2022, January 25). Pandemic grade inflation fears as number of first-class degrees awarded to university students rises to 36% from 14% in 2010, Daily Mail, retrieved April 12, 2022 from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10439723/Number-class-degrees-awarded-university-students-rises-36-14-2010.html.
  30. McInnerney, J. M., & Roberts, T. S. (2004). Online learning: Social interaction and the creation of a sense of community. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 73–81. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.7.3.73
  31. McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1%3C6::AID-JCOP2290140103%3E3.0.CO;2-I
  32. McMurtrie, J. C., & Ostrikov, K. (2021). Hybrid participation options to mitigate discrimination and maximise productivity in post-COVID higher education and research workplaces. Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 44(2), 339. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13246-021-01017-y
  33. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Education evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
  34. Merola, R. H., Coelen, R. J., Hofman, W. H. A., & Jansen, E. P. W. A. (2022). Through the Looking Glass: How the COVID-19 Pandemic Changed International Branch Campuses’ Academic Experience and Home Campus Relationship. Journal of Studies in International Education. Online First. https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153211070112
  35. Moore, M. G. (2002). Editorial, what does research say about the learners using computer-mediated communication in distance learning? The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1602_1
  36. Mittelmeier, J., Rienties, B., Gunter, A., & Raghuram, P. (2021). Conceptualizing Internationalization at a Distance: A “Third Category” of University Internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 25(3), 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315320906176
  37. Murphy. (2020). COVID-19 and emergency eLearning: Consequences of the securitization of higher education for post-pandemic pedagogy. Contemporary Security Policy, 41, 492–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1761749
  38. Nakamura, K. (2022, February 10). Foreign students begin to lose patience with Japan's COVID-19 entry ban. The Japan Times. Retrieved from https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2022/02/10/national/foreign-students-entry-ban/.
  39. Ni, A. Y. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of classroom and online learning: Teaching research methods. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2013.12001730
  40. Oladipo, D. (2021, August 23). Classes starting, but international students failing to get U.S. visas. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/us/classes-starting-international-students-failing-get-us-visas-2021-08-23/
  41. Otter, R. R., Seipel, S., Graeff, T., Alexander, B., Boraiko, C., Gray, J., ... & Sadler, K. (2013). Comparing student and faculty perceptions of online and traditional courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 19(4), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.08.001
  42. Rovai, A. P. (2002). Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00102-1
  43. Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.192
  44. Schoenfeld-Tacher, R., McConnell, S., & Graham, M. (2001). Do no harm—A comparison of the effects of online vs. traditional delivery media on a science course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(3), 257–265. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Regina-Schoenfeld-Tacher/publication/226718433_Do_No_Harm-A_Comparison_of_the_Effects_of_On-Line_vs_Traditional_Delivery_Media_on_a_Science_Course/links/0c960525dc0de22d55000000/Do-No-Harm-A-Comparison-of-the-Effects-of-On-Line-vs-Traditional-Delivery-Media-on-a-Science-Course.pdf
  45. Spagat, E. (2021, January 1). Trump extends COVID-related bans on visas, green cards; court clears health insurance requirement for immigrants. USA Today. Retrieved from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/01/01/trump-extends-visa-bans/4107279001/
  46. Teodorescu, D., Aivaz, K. A., & Amalfi, A. (2021). Factors affecting motivation in online courses during the COVID-19 pandemic: the experiences of students at a Romanian public university. European Journal of Higher Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2021.1972024
  47. Varela, O. E. (2017). Learning outcomes of study-abroad programs: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(4), 531-561. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0250
  48. Waterhouse, P., Samra, R., & Lucassen, M. (2022). Distance education students’ satisfaction: Do work and family roles matter?. Distance Education, 43(1), 56-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.2020622
  49. Watermeyer, R., Crick, T., Knight, C., & Goodall, J. (2021). COVID-19 and digital disruption in UK universities: Afflictions and affordances of emergency online migration. Higher Education, 81(3), 623–641. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10734-020-00561-y
  50. Wood, S. (2021, December 13). Hybrid classes in college: What to know. U.S. News. Retrieved from https://www.usnews.com/education/articles/hybrid-classes-in-college-what-to-know.