Main Article Content

Abstract

Dynamic human development in the 21st Century demands students to make innovations in the world of education. Students are required to have 21st-century skills, namely creativity, critical thinking, collaboration, and communication. In contrast, teachers are required to have skills that must be mastered. The six capabilities are mastery of knowledge/content, mastery of 21st-century pedagogy, the ability of expertise in the development and achievement of students and give support, mastery of learning psychology skills; having counseling skills; and competence in using information technology and media. This article aims to discuss issues related to how to improve the ability of teachers and students to master 21st-century skills? Also, what extent is the role of digital literacy and STEM integration in improving 21st-century skills? This article using literature literacy methods sourced from international and national journals, books, and other relevant sources. Based on the study, it concluded that digital competence is not an absolute determinant of the development of 21st-century skills in students. Digital ability is a supporting factor for mastering 21st-century skills that should have been introduced and taught through schools. STEM learning with multidisciplinary mastery of science needs to be optimized in schools in Indonesia so that the expected learning objectives are in line with the demands of the 21st-century.

Keywords

21st Century Skills Digital Literacy Digital Competency STEM

Article Details

How to Cite
Rizaldi, D. R., Nurhayati, E., & Fatimah, Z. (2020). The Correlation of Digital Literation and STEM Integration to Improve Indonesian Students’ Skills in 21st Century. International Journal of Asian Education, 1(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v1i2.36

References

  1. Alismail, H. A., & McGuire, P. (2015). 21st century standards and curriculum: Current research and practice. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(6), 150-154.
  2. Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and concepts of digital Literacy. In C. Lankshear, & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies, and practices (pp. 17e32). New-York: Peter Lang.
  3. Bellanca, J., dan Brandt, R. (2010). 21^st Century Skills: Rethinking How Students Learn. USA: Solution Tree Press.
  4. Byhee, B. (2010). Advancing STEM Education: A 2020 Vision. Technology and engineering teacher, 70(1), 30-35.
  5. Boavida, F., Kliem, A., Renner, T., Riekki, J., Jouvray, C., Jacobi, M., ... & Triviño, A. (2016). People-centric internet of things—challenges, approach, and enabling technologies. In Intelligent Distributed Computing IX (pp. 463-474). Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25017-5_44.
  6. Chew, C.M., Idris, N., Leong, K. E. & Daud, M.F.(2013). Secondary School Assessment Practices in Science, Technology, and Mathematics (STEM) Related Subjects. Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(2):58-69.
  7. Claro, M., Preiss, D. D., San MartíN, E., Jara, I., Hinostroza, J. E., Valenzuela, S., ... & Nussbaum, M. (2012). Assessment of 21st century ICT skills in Chile: Test design and results from high school level students. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1042-1053. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.004.
  8. Dewi, M., Kaniawati, I., & Suwarma, I. R. (2018). Penerapan pembelajaran fisika menggunakan pendekatan STEM untuk meningkatkan kemampuan memecahkan masalah siswa pada materi listrik dinamis. In Quantum: Seminar Nasional Fisika, dan Pendidikan Fisika (pp. 381-385).
  9. Farwati, R., Permanasari, A., Firman, H., & Suhery, T. (2018). Integrasi Problem Based Learning dalam STEM education berorientasi pada aktualisasi literasi lingkungan dan kreativitas. In Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 198-206).
  10. Ferguson, R.B. (2015). Multimodal literacy as a form of communication. Bachelor Thesis.Sweden: Dalarna University.
  11. Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks. Seville: Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. DOI: 10.2791/82116.
  12. Hamdan, H. (2018). Industri 4.0: Pengaruh Revolusi Industri Pada Kewirausahaan Demi Kemandirian Ekonomi. Jurnal Nusantara Aplikasi Manajemen Bisnis, 3(2), 1-8. DOI: 10.29407/nusamba.v3i2.12142.
  13. Ismayani, A. (2016). Pengaruh penerapan STEM project-based learning terhadap kreativitas matematis siswa SMK. Indonesian Digital Journal of Mathematics and Education, 3(4), 264-272.
  14. Lase, D. (2019). Pendidikan di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. SUNDERMANN: Jurnal Ilmiah Teologi, Pendidikan, Sains, Humaniora dan Kebudayaan, 1(1), 28-43. DOI: 10.36588/sundermann.v1i1.18.
  15. Leahy, D., & Dolan, D. (2010). Digital Literacy: A vital competence for 2010?. In IFIP International Conference on Key Competencies in the Knowledge Society (pp. 210-221). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15378-5_21.
  16. McKenna, H. P. (2018). Creativity and ambient urbanizing at the intersection of the Internet of Things and People in smart cities. In International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 295-307). Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92052-8_23.
  17. McNicol, S. (2015). Modeling information literacy for classrooms of the future. Journal of librarianship and information science, 47(4), 303-313. DOI: 10.1177/0961000614526612.
  18. Morrison, J., Bartlett, R., & Raymond, V. (2009). STEM as a curriculum. Education Week, 23(19.0).
  19. Prasetyo, H dan Sutopo, W. (2018). Industri 4.0: Telaah Klasifikasi Aspek dan Arah Perkembangan Riset. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 13(1), 17-18. DOI: 10.14710/jati.13.1.17-26.
  20. Pujiati, A. (2019). Peningkatan Literasi Sains dengan Pembelajaran STEM Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Diskusi Panel Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1).
  21. Rusdin, NM. (2017). Teacher's Readiness in Implementing 21st Century Learning. Universitas Sultan Idris Malaysia: Faculty of Human Development.
  22. Santosa, I. (2019). Pengaruh Revolusi Industri Ke-Empat (Industri 4.0) terhadap Pendidikan Tinggi berbasis Kreatifitas. In Sandyakala: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Seni, Kriya, dan Desain. (Vol. 1, pp. 1-9).
  23. Sartika, D. (2019). Pentingnya Pendidikan Berbasis STEM dalam Kurikulum 2013. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan), 3(3). DOI: 10.36312/jisip.v3i3.797.
  24. Setyosari, P. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan & Pengembangan. Jakarta: PRENADAMEIA GROUP.
  25. Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st-century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110-116. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253.
  26. Wahyuaji, N. R., & Suparman, S. (2019). Deskripsi Kebutuhan Media Pembelajaran E-learning Berpendekatan STEM Untuk Mengembangkan kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif Siswa SMA Kelas XI. In Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Ahmad Dahlan (Vol. 6).
  27. Walser, N. (2008). Teaching 21st-century skills. Harvard Education Letter, 24(5).
  28. Wati, I., & Kamila, I. (2019). Pentingnya guru professional dalam mendidik siswa milenial untuk menghadapi revolusi 4.0. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang (Vol. 12, No. 01).
  29. Yusnaini, Y., & Slamet, S. (2019). Era Revolusi Industri 4.0: Tantangan Dan peluang Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Literasi Pendidikan. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang (Vol. 12, No. 01).