Main Article Content

Abstract

This study explores Chat AI, specifically Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT), among international TESOL students to enhance academic writing. The research addresses the complexity of academic writing for TESOL students and the potential of Chat AI as a promising tool by investigating perceptions, experiences, and impacts. Previous studies note positive outcomes like increased motivation and creativity but also identify limitations, including occasional inaccuracies. Using purposive sampling, this qualitative study involves five international TESOL students with Chat AI experience. Semi-structured interviews, lasting 15-30 minutes, are conducted in person or through video conferencing, recorded, transcribed, and anonymized for thematic analysis. Findings reveal positive perceptions of Chat AI, highlighting convenience, accessibility, and prompt feedback. Despite benefits in idea generation, vocabulary improvement, and template provision, limitations include occasional inaccuracies and plagiarism concerns. Despite drawbacks, Chat AI is seen as valuable for writing proficiency. International TESOL students view Chat AI positively, appreciating its functionalities. Suggestions include incorporating correct references to address plagiarism concerns and establishing responsible usage guidelines. Continued research is recommended for a comprehensive understanding and broader insights from teachers.

Keywords

Chat AI Academic Writing International Tesol Students Perceptions Experiences Limitations Ethics Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformers (GPT)

Article Details

How to Cite
Gervacio, M. J. (2023). Breaking Barriers in Academic Writing: The Uses of Chat AI Models in Empowering International TESOL Students. International Journal of Asian Education, 4(4), 256–264. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v4i4.361

References

  1. Abdalkader, S. M. A. (2022). Using Artificial Intelligence to improve Writing Fluency for The Preparatory Stage Students in Distinguished Governmental Language Schools. Egyptian Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 39-70. https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/ejes.2022.270694
  2. AlAfnan, M. A., Dishari, S., Jovic, M., & Lomidze, K. (2023). Chatgpt as an educational tool: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations for communication, business writing, and composition courses. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology, 3(2), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.37965/jait.2023.0184
  3. Ali, J. K. M., Shamsan, M. A. A., Hezam, T. A., & Mohammed, A. A. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learning motivation: teachers and students' voices. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v2i1.51
  4. Altmäe, S., Sola-Leyva, A., & Salumets, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: a friend or a foe?. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.04.009
  5. Baskara, F. R. (2023). Integrating ChatGPT into EFL writing instruction: Benefits and challenges. International Journal of Education and Learning, 5(1), 44-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v5i1.858
  6. Biswas, S. (2023). ChatGPT and the future of medical writing. Radiology, 307(2), e223312. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.223312
  7. Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic Analysis. APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, 2, 57-71.
  8. Chen, B. (2023). Get the Best From ChatGPT With These Golden Prompts. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/25/technology/ai-chatbot-chatgpt-prompts.html#:~:text=These%20prompts%20provide%20additional%20context,patterns%20in%20its%20training%20data.
  9. Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
  10. Dawadi, S. (2021). Thematic analysis approach: A step by step guide for ELT research practitioners. Journal of NELTA, 25(1-2), 62-71. https://nelta.org.np/nelta/uploads/web-uploadsfiles/NELTA%20Journal%202020.pdf
  11. Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Saad, H. B. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615-622. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623
  12. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://www.academia.edu/download/55796997/Comparison_Convenience_and_Purposive_Sampling-2016_4p.pdf
  13. Fang, Z. (2021). What is Academic Writing? (and Other Burning Questions About It). Routledge Taylor and Francis Group. https://www.routledge.com/blog/article/what-is-academic-writing-and-other-burning-questions-about-it#
  14. Golan, R., Reddy, R., Muthigi, A., & Ramasamy, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance. Nature Reviews Urology, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-023-00746-x
  15. Hwang, K. H., Heywood, D., & Carrier, J. (2023). The Implementation of ChatGPT-assisted Writing Instruction in ESL/EFL Classrooms. 새한영어영문학, 65(3), 83-106. https://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE11509057
  16. Imran, A. A., & Lashari, A. A. (2023). Exploring the World of Artificial Intelligence: The Perception of the University Students about ChatGPT for Academic Purpose. Global Social Sciences Review, VIII. http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2023(VIII-I).34
  17. Jabar Al-Atabi, A. (2020). What is Writing. Baghdad: University of Baghdad. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341864922_What_is_Writing
  18. Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries?. Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009
  19. Mursyid, M. (2023). Integrating AI based Writing Tools to Enhance Students' Learning Process in Digital Writing. West Java: Education of Suryankancana. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unsur.ac.id/cp/article/view/3040/2094
  20. Pavlik, J. V. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 78(1), 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958221149577
  21. Qadir, J. (2023, May). Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education. In 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1-9). IEEE. https://www.techrxiv.org/articles/preprint/Engineering_Education_in_the_Era_of_ChatGPT_Promise_and_Pitfalls_of_Generative_AI_for_Education/21789434/1/files/38676764.pdf
  22. Rahmat, N. H., Zakaria, N., Noorezam, M., Sa’adan, N., & Ibrahim, N. (2023). Getting Through ZPD in Collaborative Writing: The Case for Online Learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 13(1), 1753 – 1765. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i1/16066
  23. Roe, J., Renandya, W. A., & Jacobs, G. M. (2023). A Review of AI-Powered Writing Tools and Their Implications for Academic Integrity in the Language Classroom. Journal of English and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.59588/2961-3094.1035
  24. Su, Y., Lin, Y., & Lai, C. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms. Assessing Writing, 57, 100752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100752
  25. Sumakul, D. T. Y., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022, February). Students’ Perceptions of the Use of AI in a Writing Class. In 67th TEFLIN International Virtual Conference & the 9th ICOELT 2021 (TEFLIN ICOELT 2021) (pp. 52-57). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220201.009
  26. UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO Publications. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380063
  27. Utami, S. P. T., & Winarni, R. (2023). Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive?. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13419
  28. Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 1-25. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4