Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the experiences of four Ph.D. drop-out students in Geography programs in Turkey. Phone interviews were used to collect data. Narrative inquiry was used as a research design. Snowball sampling was used to reach the participants of the study. The study participants were two men and two women who started their Ph.D. programs in different universities in Turkey. The main reason that the participants had started their Ph.D. degrees was for getting academic jobs. The participants reported that they had positive experiences such as learning new skills and expanding knowledge but also negative experiences during their Ph.D. programs. All participants dropped out of their Ph.D. programs while they were writing their dissertations. Participants reported several personal (e.g., lack of skills) and circumstantial (e.g., social responsibilities, commuting) factors as reasons for quitting their Ph.D. programs. For educators, administrators, and policymakers, we recommended that setting higher criteria for Ph.D. students should be considered to attract and accept the best candidates for doctoral programs. During the doctorate, students should be able to select their supervisors or change their supervisors. In addition, doctoral students should be offered opportunities to socialize, share information, and learn from each other and should be encouraged to cooperate.

Keywords

Doctoral education graduate students dropouts geography education

Article Details

How to Cite
Emmioglu Sarikaya, E., & Çağlar, A. (2021). The Experiences of Ph.D. Dropouts in Geography . International Journal of Asian Education, 2(3), 296–304. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v2i3.197

References

  1. Author, McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2017).
  2. Adams, J. S. (2015). Reality therapy for geography Ph.D. programs. GeoJournal 80, 169.
  3. Alkan, Z. (2018). Doktora öğrencilerinin katıldıkları çeşitli akademik etkinliklerin doktora tezi yazma sürecine yansımaları [The Roles of Different Academic Activities in Dissertation Writing Process]. (Master’s Thesis) Tokat: Gaziosmanpasa University, Graduate School of Educational Sciences.
  4. Babbit, V., Rudd, E., Morrison, E., Picciano, J., & Nerad, M. (2008). Careers of Geography PhDs. Washington: Center for Innovation and Research in Graduate Education. Retrieved from http://www.education.uw.edu/cirge/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/ss5-geography-report.pdf
  5. Bair, C. R., & Haworth, J. G. (1999, 18-20 November). Doctoral student attrition and persistence: A meta-synthesis of research. Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Meeting Paper, San Antonio, Texas.
  6. Barnes, B. J., & Austin, A. E. (2009). The role of doctoral advisors: A look at advising from the advisor’s perspective. Innovative Higher Education, 33(5), 297-315. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10755-008-9084-x
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş., & Köklü, N. (1999). Advisors’ opinions about the research competencies of Master’s and doctorate students in educational sciences. Education and Science, 23(112), 18-28.
  8. CHET, Council of Higher Education, Turkey. (2016). Regulations for Graduate Education and Instruction. Retrieved from https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/File/GeneratePdf?mevzuatNo=21510&mevzuatTur=KurumVeKurulusYonetmeligi&mevzuatTertip=5
  9. CHET, Council of Higher Education, Turkey. (2017). Higher Education Information Management System, Accessed 1 February 2021. Retrieved from https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr
  10. CHET, Council of Higher Education, Turkey. 2021. Higher Education Information Management System, Accessed 1 February 2021. Retrieved from https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr
  11. Clandinin, D.J. (2006). Narrative inquiry: A methodology for studying lived experience. Research Studies in Music Education, 27, 44-54.
  12. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  13. Clandinin, D. J., Huber, J., Steeves, P., & Li, Y. (2011). Becoming a narrative inquirer: learning to attend within the three-dimensional narrative inquiry space. In Learning and Teaching Narrative Inquiry: Travelling in the Borderlands, S. Trahar (ed.), 33–51. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins
  14. Di Pierro, M. (2007). Excellence in doctoral education: Defining best practices. College Student Journal, 41(2), 368-375. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asn&AN=25093211&lang=tr&site=ehost-live
  15. Doğanay, H. (2002). Coğrafya Öğretim Yöntemleri: Orta Öğretimde Coğrafya Öğretiminin Esasları [Instructional Methods In Geography: The Fundamentals Of Geography Instruction In Middle School]. Erzurum: Aktif Yayınevi.
  16. Dufty‐Jones, R. (2018). The career aspirations and expectations of geography doctoral students: establishing academic subjectivities within a shifting landscape. Geographical Research, 56: 126-138. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12270
  17. Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. R. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 39, 607-631. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023/A:1018705823763.pdf
  18. Gardner, S. K. (2009). Conceptualizing success in doctoral education: Perspectives of faculty in seven disciplines. The Review of Higher Education, 32(3), 383-406. Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/article/259666/summary
  19. Gardner, S. K., & Gopaul, B. (2012) The part-time doctoral student experience. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7(2012), 63-78.
  20. Gardner, S. K., & Holley, K. A. (2011). “Those invisible barriers are real”: The progression of first-generation students through doctoral education. Equity and Excellence in Education, 44(1), 77–92. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2011.529791
  21. Golde, C. M. (2005). The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments. Journal of Higher Education, 76(6), 669-700. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2005.11772304
  22. Hunter, K. H., & Devine, K. (2016). Doctoral students’ emotional exhaustion and intentions to leave academia. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 35-61. Retrieved from http://www.informingscience.com/ijds/Volume11/IJDSv11p035-061Hunter2198.pdf
  23. Jones, M. (2013). Issues in doctoral studies- forty years of journal discussion: Where have we been and where are we going? International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 8(2013), 83 – 104.
  24. Keskinkılıç, S. B., & Ertürk, A. (2009). Eğitim bilimleri doktora öğrencilerinin istatistiksel bilgi yeterlilikleri.[Statistical knowledge competency of the educational sciences doctoral students] Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1). 141-151. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1494915
  25. Martinsuo, M., & Turkulainen, V. (2011). Personal commitment, support and progress in doctoral studies. Studies in Higher Education, 36(1), 103-120. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903469598
  26. McAlpine, L.,Paulson, J., Gonsalves, A., & Jazvac-Martek, M. (2012). ‘Untold’ doctoral stories: can we move beyond cultural narratives of neglect? Higher Education Research and Development, 31(4), 511-523. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.559199
  27. Merga, M. K., & Mason, S. (2020). Doctoral education and early career researcher preparedness for diverse research output production. Journal of Further and Higher Education 1-16. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1807477
  28. Monk, J., & Solem, M. (2015). Changing doctoral education: The case of US geography GeoJournal, 80, 187. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10708-014-9586-2.pdf
  29. O’Meara, K., Knudsen, K., & Jones, J. (2013). The role of emotional competencies in faculty-doctoral student relationships. The Review of Higher Education, 36(3), 315-347. Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/article/502332
  30. Pyhältö, K., Toom, A., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2012). Challenges of becoming a scholar: A study of doctoral students’ problems and well-being. International Scholarly Research Network Education, 12, 1-12. Retrieved from https://downloads.hindawi.com/archive/2012/934941.pdf
  31. Ramutsindela, M. (2015). Geography PhDs and the changing environment in South Africa. GeoJournal, 80, 251-255 Retrieved from https://doi.org/0.1007/s10708-014-9571-9
  32. Roberts, S. M. (2015). Doctoral programs in geography in the United States. GeoJournal, 80, 247 250. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10708-014-9581-7.pdf
  33. Sinclair, J., Barnacle, R., & Cuthbert, D. (2014). How the doctorate contributes to the formation of active researchers: What the research tells us. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), 1972-1986. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.806460
  34. Sweitzer, V. (2009). Towards a theory of doctoral student professional identity development: A developmental Networks approach. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(1), 2-33. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00221546.2009.11772
  35. Tortumluoğlu, G., & Özyazıcıoğlu, N. (2004). Akademisyenlerin araştırma yaparken ve yayınlatırken karşılaştıkları güçlükler ve bunun üzerinde doktora eğitiminin etkisi.[Research and publication challenges of academicians’ and the impact of doctoral education] Journal of Human Sciences, 1(1), 1-11. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/169/169
  36. Wright, T. (2003). Post graduate research students: People in context? British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 31(2), 209–227. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/0306988031000102379
  37. Ynalvez, R.,Garza‐Gongora, C., Ynalvez, M. A., & Hara, N. (2014). Research experiences and mentoring practices in selected east Asian graduate programs: Predictors of research productivity among doctoral students in molecular biology. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 42(4), 305-322. Retrieved from https://iubmb.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/bmb.20794