Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 30 Download : 24

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the experiences of public primary school principals in Istanbul in implementing school improvement strategies, addressing challenges, and assessing the outcomes of their efforts. Using a qualitative case study design, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with nine experienced principals, focusing on their activities, challenges, and solutions in fostering educational change. The findings highlight the importance of systematic planning, creating supportive learning environments, and fostering participatory leadership to drive school improvement. Collaborative approaches, involving teachers, parents, and community stakeholders, were emphasized as key to achieving shared goals. Principals faced several challenges, including a lack of organizational culture, resistance to change, excessive administrative demands, inadequate physical conditions, and resource limitations. To address these issues, they employed strategies such as building participatory school cultures, establishing effective communication networks, and leveraging external support from NGOs and municipalities. These efforts not only mitigated immediate barriers but also strengthened stakeholder relationships and promoted a sense of collective ownership. The results indicate significant positive impacts on students, teachers, and parents. School improvement initiatives enhanced student engagement, increased teacher satisfaction, and improved school-community relationships. Principals also reported that their schools became more desirable within their communities, reflecting the broader benefits of their leadership efforts. This study contributes to understanding effective school improvement practices in urban settings and underscores the importance of systemic support and equitable resource allocation. It provides actionable insights for policymakers and educators, emphasizing the need for sustainable strategies to ensure continuous progress in education.

Keywords

School Improvement School Principals Participatory Leadership Educational Challenges Urban Education

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Dinler, C. (2024). Challenges and Strategies in School Improvement: School Principals’ Experiences and Reflections. International Journal of Asian Education, 5(4), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v5i4.451
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Afzal Tajik, M., & Wali, A. (2020). Principals’ Strategies for Increasing Students’ Participation in School Leadership in a Rural, Mountainous Region in Pakistan. Improving Schools, 23(3), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480220923413
  2. Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting Inclusion and Equity in Education: Lessons from International Experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587
  3. Allmnakrah, A., & Evers, C. (2019). The Need for a Fundamental Shift in the Saudi Education System: Implementing the Saudi Arabian Economic Vision 2030. Research in Education, 106(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034523719851534
  4. Anderson, A. (2019). Advancing Global Citizenship Education Through Global Competence and Critical Literacy: Innovative Practices for Inclusive Childhood Education. SAGE Open, 9(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019826000
  5. Ataguba, O. A., & Ataguba, J. E. (2020). Social Determinants of Health: The Role of Effective Communication in the COVID-19 Pandemic in Developing Countries. Global Health Action, 13(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1788263
  6. Belasen, A. T., & Belasen, A. R. (2019). The Strategic Value of Integrated Corporate Communication: Functions, Social Media, and Stakeholders. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(5), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2019.1661842
  7. Bell, E., & Smith, K. (2021). Working Within a System of Administrative Burden: How Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Role Perceptions Shape Access to the Promise of Higher Education. Administration & Society, 54(2), 167–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211027535
  8. Bozeman, B., & Youtie, J. (2020). Robotic Bureaucracy: Administrative Burden and Red Tape in University Research. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13105
  9. Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2022). Stakeholder Governance: Solving the Collective Action Problems in Joint Value Creation. Academy of Management Review, 47(2), 214–236. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0441
  10. Burbules, N. C., Fan, G., & Repp, P. (2020). Five Trends of Education and Technology in a Sustainable Future. Geography and Sustainability, 1(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.05.001
  11. Busse, R., & Regenberg, S. (2019). Revisiting the “Authoritarian Versus Participative” Leadership Style Legacy: A New Model of the Impact of Leadership Inclusiveness on Employee Engagement. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 26(4), 510–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818810135
  12. Chan, S. C. H. (2019). Participative Leadership and Job Satisfaction. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(3), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-06-2018-0215
  13. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2023). Revisiting Mixed Methods Research Designs Twenty Years Later. In Handbook of Mixed Methods Research Designs (pp. 21–36). SAGE Publications. https://www.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=_UK2EAAAQBAJ
  14. Daly-Smith, A., Quarmby, T., Archbold, V. S. J., Corrigan, N., Wilson, D., Resaland, G. K., Bartholomew, J. B., Singh, A., Tjomsland, H. E., Sherar, L. B., Chalkley, A., Routen, A. C., Shickle, D., Bingham, D. D., Barber, S. E., Van Sluijs, E., Fairclough, S. J., & McKenna, J. (2020). Using a Multi-stakeholder Experience-based Design Process to Co-develop the Creating Active Schools Framework. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 17(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-0917-z
  15. Daniëls, E., Hondeghem, A., & Dochy, F. (2019). A Review on Leadership and Leadership Development in Educational Settings. Educational Research Review, 27(June), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.003
  16. Fuchong, L. (2022). Singular or Plural? Administrative Burden and Doing Business in China. Journal of Chinese Governance, 7(4), 616–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2020.1859793
  17. Gara, G. L., & La Porte, J. M. (2020). Processes of Building Trust in Organizations: Internal Communication, Management, and Recruiting. Church, Communication and Culture, 5(3), 298–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2020.1824581
  18. García-Martínez, I., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Molina-Fernández, E., & Fernández-Batanero, J. M. (2021). Mapping Teacher Collaboration for School Success. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(4), 631–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2021.1925700
  19. Gleddie, D. L., & Morgan, A. (2021). Physical Literacy Praxis: A Theoretical Framework for Transformative Physical Education. PROSPECTS, 50(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09481-2
  20. Hill, J., Healey, R. L., West, H., & Déry, C. (2021). Pedagogic Partnership in Higher Education: Encountering Emotion in Learning and Enhancing Student Wellbeing. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 45(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1661366
  21. Howard, P., O’Brien, C., Kay, B., & O’Rourke, K. (2019). Leading Educational Change in the 21st Century: Creating Living Schools through Shared Vision and Transformative Governance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(15), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154109
  22. Khaw, K. W., Alnoor, A., AL-Abrrow, H., Tiberius, V., Ganesan, Y., & Atshan, N. A. (2023). Reactions Towards Organizational Change: A Systematic Literature Review. Current Psychology, 42(22), 19137–19160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03070-6
  23. Kosim, M., Muqoddam, F., Mubarok, F., & Laila, N. Q. (2023). The Dynamics of Islamic Education Policies in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172930
  24. Lee, M., & Louis, K. S. (2019). Mapping a Strong School Culture and Linking It to Sustainable School Improvement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 81(May), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.02.001
  25. Leighton, K., Kardong-Edgren, S., Schneidereith, T., & Foisy-Doll, C. (2021). Using Social Media and Snowball Sampling as an Alternative Recruitment Strategy for Research. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 55(June), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.03.006
  26. Leithwood, K. (2021). A Review of Evidence about Equitable School Leadership. Education Sciences, 11(8), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080377
  27. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven Strong Claims about Successful School Leadership Revisited. School Leadership and Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
  28. Li, C., & Zhang, C. (2024). Transformative Perspectives in Physical Education Evaluation: Empowering Diverse Stakeholders for Holistic Learning Experiences in the Era of Big Data. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(3), 13334–13360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01637-7
  29. Madani, R. A. (2019). Analysis of Educational Quality, a Goal of Education for All Policy. Higher Education Studies, 9(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v9n1p100
  30. Marshall, C., Gerstl-Pepin, C., & Johnson, M. (2020). Educational Politics for Social Justice. Teachers College Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=EZfLDwAAQBAJ
  31. Martínez-Peláez, R., Ochoa-Brust, A., Rivera, S., Félix, V. G., Ostos, R., Brito, H., Félix, R. A., & Mena, L. J. (2023). Role of Digital Transformation for Achieving Sustainability: Mediated Role of Stakeholders, Key Capabilities, and Technology. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(14), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411221
  32. Mayger, L. K., & Provinzano, K. (2022). Community School Leadership: Identifying Qualities Necessary for Developing and Supporting Equity-Centered Principals. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 21(2), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2020.1759652
  33. Michael, M. (2012). Anecdote. In Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social (p. 11). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203854921
  34. Miles, M. B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=U4lU_-wJ5QEC
  35. Perry-Hazan, L., & Somech, A. (2023). Conceptualising Student Participation in School Decision Making: An Integrative Model. Educational Review, 75(6), 1202–1223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1976113
  36. Peurach, D. J., Cohen, D. K., Yurkofsky, M. M., & Spillane, J. P. (2019). From Mass Schooling to Education Systems: Changing Patterns in the Organization and Management of Instruction. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 32–67. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821131
  37. Pineda-Báez, C., Bauman, C., & Andrews, D. (2020). Empowering Teacher Leadership: A Cross-country Study. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 23(4), 388–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2018.1543804
  38. Pont, B. (2020). A Literature Review of School Leadership Policy Reforms. European Journal of Education, 55(2), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12398
  39. Prado Tuma, A., & Spillane, J. P. (2019). Novice School Principals Constructing Their Role Vis-À-Vis External Stakeholders: (Not) Attempting to Be “All Things to All People.” Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(5), 812–840. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18822101
  40. Robinson, V., & Gray, E. (2019). What Difference does School Leadership Make to Student Outcomes? Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 49(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2019.1582075
  41. Schildkamp, K. (2019). Data-based Decision-making for School Improvement: Research Insights and Gaps. Educational Research, 61(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1625716
  42. Smith, T. E., Sheridan, S. M., Kim, E. M., Park, S., & Beretvas, S. N. (2020). The Effects of Family-School Partnership Interventions on Academic and Social-Emotional Functioning: a Meta-Analysis Exploring What Works for Whom. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 511–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09509-w
  43. Talwar, S., Dhir, A., Islam, N., Kaur, P., & Almusharraf, A. (2023). Resistance of Multiple Stakeholders to E-health Innovations: Integration of Fundamental Insights and Guiding Research Paths. Journal of Business Research, 166(July), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114135
  44. Taylor, B., Francis, B., Craig, N., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Mazenod, A., Tereshchenko, A., & Pepper, D. (2019). Why is It Difficult for Schools to Establish Equitable Practices in Allocating Students to Attainment ‘Sets’? British Journal of Educational Studies, 67(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2018.1424317
  45. Thompson, A., & Parent, M. M. (2021). Understanding the Impact of Radical Change on the Effectiveness of National-Level Sport Organizations: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective. Sport Management Review, 24(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2020.04.005
  46. Van Maanen, J. (1998). Qualitative Studies of Organizations. Vol. 1. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=rQ3rQLH1Ba4C
  47. Vincent, C., McClure, H., Marquez, B., & Goodrich, D. (2021). Designing Professional Development in Restorative Practices: Assessing High School Personnel’s, Students’, and Parents’ Perceptions of Discipline Practices. NASSP Bulletin, 105(4), 250–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/01926365211045461
  48. Wall, A. (2021). Visions of Middle School: How Beginning Teacher Candidates Describe their Early Visions for Teaching. Peabody Journal of Education, 96(4), 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2021.1965440
  49. Wallerstein, N., Oetzel, J. G., Sanchez-Youngman, S., Boursaw, B., Dickson, E., Kastelic, S., Koegel, P., Lucero, J. E., Magarati, M., Ortiz, K., Parker, M., Peña, J., Richmond, A., & Duran, B. (2020). Engage for Equity: A Long-Term Study of Community-Based Participatory Research and Community-Engaged Research Practices and Outcomes. Health Education & Behavior, 47(3), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198119897075
  50. Wehn, U., & Almomani, A. (2019). Incentives and Barriers for Participation in Community-based Environmental Monitoring and Information Systems: A Critical Analysis and Integration of the Literature. Environmental Science and Policy, 101(September), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.09.002
  51. Wilson Heenan, I., Lafferty, N., & McNamara, P. M. (2024). Enactment of Transformational School Leadership—Insights from Primary School and System Leaders. Education Sciences, 14(6), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060557
  52. Woelert, P. (2023). Administrative Burden in Higher Education Institutions: A Conceptualisation and a Research Agenda. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 45(4), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2023.2190967
  53. Yulianti, K., Denessen, E., Droop, M., & Veerman, G. J. (2021). Transformational Leadership for Parental Involvement: How Teachers Perceive the School Leadership Practices to Promote Parental Involvement in Children’s Education. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 20(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2019.1668424
  54. Yurkofsky, M. M., Peterson, A. J., Mehta, J. D., Horwitz-Willis, R., & Frumin, K. M. (2020). Research on Continuous Improvement: Exploring the Complexities of Managing Educational Change. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 403–433. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20907363
  55. Zhang, S., Li, G., Yu, R., Chang, Y., Yang, Y., Zhang, Q., Liu, W., & Hao, J. (2024). Understanding the Shortboard of Regional Sustainable Development: Fairness and Efficiency of Rural Public Resource Allocation in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(7), 16739–16756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03308-8